An app that I'm operative on has been experiencing an unequivocally rare
wreck that we am amateurish to imitate and a wholly information we have
about is it from Crashlytics. It is wholly duty on ios7 and googling
mmapFileDeallocate advantage one site where someone else was experiencing
a same wreck though their emanate went divided with an os update. Here is
a stack:Thread : Crashed: tcpConnWorkQueue0 libobjc.A.dylib
0x3aa00b36 objc_msgSend + 211 CFNetwork 0x2fece4c3
__CFURLCache::removeMMappedDataFromSet(void*) + 342 CFNetwork
0x2fecfa45 mmapFileDeallocate(void*, void*) + 243 CoreFoundation
0x3024ef5f __CFDataDeallocate + 304 CoreFoundation
0x301c75f7 CFRelease + 4625 CoreFoundation
0x3023fed5 __CFArrayReleaseValues + 2926 CoreFoundation
0x301c75f7 CFRelease + 4627 CFNetwork 0x2fe5f1d5
__CFCachedURLResponse::~__CFCachedURLResponse() + 408 CFNetwork
0x2fe5f19f __CFCachedURLResponse::~__CFCachedURLResponse() +
109 CoreFoundation 0x301c75f7 CFRelease + 46210 CFNetwork
0x2feaeda1 HTTPProtocol::~HTTPProtocol() + 73211
CoreFoundation 0x301c75f7 CFRelease + 46212 CoreFoundation
0x302b10f0 __CFBasicHashDrain + 33213 CoreFoundation
0x301c75f7 CFRelease + 46214 CFNetwork
0x2fe9226b SocketStream::~SocketStream() + 40615 CFNetwork
0x2fe920c5 SocketStream::~SocketStream() + 2016 CoreFoundation
0x301c75f7 CFRelease + 46217 libdispatch.dylib
0x3aee8d1b _dispatch_call_block_and_release + 1018 libdispatch.dylib
0x3aeef273 _dispatch_queue_drain$VARIANT$mp + 37419
libdispatch.dylib 0x3aeef06b
_dispatch_queue_invoke$VARIANT$mp + 4220 libdispatch.dylib
0x3aeefce1 _dispatch_root_queue_drain + 7621 libdispatch.dylib
0x3aeeff59 _dispatch_worker_thread2 + 5622 libsystem_pthread.dylib
0x3b02adbf _pthread_wqthread + 298I can post other threads during time of
wreck though a wholly one that stands out to me is AFNetworking though we
haven't been means to find anything identical in their issues.
Brents
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
Friday, 4 April 2014
I cant get my ios tradition urlscheme to work with numbers
If i use for exampleseveneleven:// it worksif i use 711:// it fails
or7eleven:// it failsI searched a web and found no law for this same
issue. Am we a initial one or is it only supposed personally that u cant
use url schemes that start with numbers?
or7eleven:// it failsI searched a web and found no law for this same
issue. Am we a initial one or is it only supposed personally that u cant
use url schemes that start with numbers?
Tuesday, 1 April 2014
Best proceed to Retrofit all JS files for replacing .forEach(iteratorFn) with _.each(, iteratorFn)
Best proceed to Retrofit all JS files for replacing .forEach(iteratorFn)
with _.each(, iteratorFn)I have integrate of leave JS files, that we need
to retrofit to support cross-browser web-based concentration ( personally
for IE8 support)For that, we need to reinstate many of a methods, by
providing an altogether opposite signatureFor
e.g:-myArrayObj.forEach(function(myObj){//do something},
this);To:_.each(myArrayObj, function(myObj){//do something},
this);Similarly we need to reinstate some(not all) of a next methods as
well, that are not upheld natively by IE8.(For e.g some of a ES5 Features
:- Object: keysArray: isArrayArray.prototype: forEach, map, filter,
every, some, reduce, reduceRight, indexOf, lastIndexOfDate:
nowDate.prototype: toISOString, toJSONFunction.prototype:
bindString.prototype: trim)to homogeneous APIs in underscore libraries.I
am not good with unchanging expressions, and we also attempted npm grasp
utility(npm exercise -g grasp), however opposed some issues during
run-time in replacement.Any suggestion/comment is unequivocally many
appreciated, if someone can advise a illustration countenance or a
improved proceed to do a replacement.
with _.each(, iteratorFn)I have integrate of leave JS files, that we need
to retrofit to support cross-browser web-based concentration ( personally
for IE8 support)For that, we need to reinstate many of a methods, by
providing an altogether opposite signatureFor
e.g:-myArrayObj.forEach(function(myObj){//do something},
this);To:_.each(myArrayObj, function(myObj){//do something},
this);Similarly we need to reinstate some(not all) of a next methods as
well, that are not upheld natively by IE8.(For e.g some of a ES5 Features
:- Object: keysArray: isArrayArray.prototype: forEach, map, filter,
every, some, reduce, reduceRight, indexOf, lastIndexOfDate:
nowDate.prototype: toISOString, toJSONFunction.prototype:
bindString.prototype: trim)to homogeneous APIs in underscore libraries.I
am not good with unchanging expressions, and we also attempted npm grasp
utility(npm exercise -g grasp), however opposed some issues during
run-time in replacement.Any suggestion/comment is unequivocally many
appreciated, if someone can advise a illustration countenance or a
improved proceed to do a replacement.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)